Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Government is not Bad. Reagan was Wrong!

Paul Krugman (Princeton Prof and Nobel Prize wimnning economist) is so correct in his op-ed column in the New York Times (Aug 24, 2009). The ideas of the Reganites (Government is bad; tax cuts for the rich are good; on and on) are not only wrong and misguided. Those ideas have given us a prosperous country for the few rich, and an uneducated, unaware citizenry lacking good health care, economic security, and mass media we can trust to tell us the truth about these matters. Middle class Americans (median family income is around $50,000 a year) don't seem to know, or don't seem to care, that their wages have stagnated since 1973. Our health care system is not rated anywhere near #1 according to the World Health Organization, but any mention of reform or public option sends right wing nut jobs over the edge at public meetings. Many Reaganites champion "competition" for all the games the rich have rigged, but reject the idea that the insurance companies (20% of what they take in goes to profits) should compete with a system like medicare (4% overhead costs) that would give us real choice in health care. Read on - Rick
*******************************************

All the President’s Zombies
By PAUL KRUGMAN August 24, 2009 Op-Ed Columnist

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/opinion/24krugman.html?em

The debate over the “public option” in health care has been dismaying in many ways. Perhaps the most depressing aspect for progressives, however, has been the extent to which opponents of greater choice in health care have gained traction — in Congress, if not with the broader public — simply by repeating, over and over again, that the public option would be, horrors, a government program.

Washington, it seems, is still ruled by Reaganism — by an ideology that says government intervention is always bad, and leaving the private sector to its own devices is always good.
Call me naïve, but I actually hoped that the failure of Reaganism in practice would kill it. It turns out, however, to be a zombie doctrine: even though it should be dead, it keeps on coming.


Let’s talk for a moment about why the age of Reagan should be over.

First of all, even before the current crisis Reaganomics had failed to deliver what it promised. Remember how lower taxes on high incomes and deregulation that unleashed the “magic of the marketplace” were supposed to lead to dramatically better outcomes for everyone? Well, it didn’t happen.

To be sure, the wealthy benefited enormously: the real incomes of the top .01 percent of Americans rose sevenfold between 1980 and 2007. But the real income of the median family rose only 22 percent, less than a third its growth over the previous 27 years.

Moreover, most of whatever gains ordinary Americans achieved came during the Clinton years. President George W. Bush, who had the distinction of being the first Reaganite president to also have a fully Republican Congress, also had the distinction of presiding over the first administration since Herbert Hoover in which the typical family failed to see any significant income gains.

And then there’s the small matter of the worst recession since the 1930s.

There’s a lot to be said about the financial disaster of the last two years, but the short version is simple:
politicians in the thrall of Reaganite ideology dismantled the New Deal regulations that had prevented banking crises for half a century, believing that financial markets could take care of themselves. The effect was to make the financial system vulnerable to a 1930s-style crisis — and the crisis came.

“We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals,” said Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1937. “We know now that it is bad economics.” And last year we learned that lesson all over again.

Or did we? The astonishing thing about the current political scene is the extent to which nothing has changed.

The debate over the public option has, as I said, been depressing in its inanity. Opponents of the option — not just Republicans, but Democrats like Senator Kent Conrad and Senator Ben Nelson — have offered no coherent arguments against it. Mr. Nelson has
warned ominously that if the option were available, Americans would choose it over private insurance — which he treats as a self-evidently bad thing, rather than as what should happen if the government plan was, in fact, better than what private insurers offer.

But it’s much the same on other fronts. Efforts to strengthen bank regulation appear to be losing steam, as opponents of reform declare that more regulation would lead to less financial innovation — this just months after the wonders of innovation brought our financial system to the edge of collapse, a collapse that was averted only with huge infusions of taxpayer funds.

So why won’t these zombie ideas die?

Part of the answer is that there’s a lot of money behind them. “It is difficult to get a man to understand something,” said Upton Sinclair, “when his salary” — or, I would add, his campaign contributions — “depend upon his not understanding it.” In particular, vast amounts of insurance industry money have been flowing to obstructionist Democrats like Mr. Nelson and Senator Max Baucus, whose Gang of Six negotiations have been a crucial roadblock to legislation.


But some of the blame also must rest with President Obama, who famously praised Reagan during the Democratic primary, and hasn’t used the bully pulpit to confront government-is-bad fundamentalism. That’s ironic, in a way, since a large part of what made Reagan so effective, for better or for worse, was the fact that he sought to change America’s thinking as well as its tax code.

How will this all work out? I don’t know. But it’s hard to avoid the sense that a crucial opportunity is being missed, that we’re at what should be a turning point but are failing to make the turn.

Labels: , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

michael kors online
nike outlet store
instyler
tory burch outlet online
mulberry handbags sale
coach outlet clearance
tory burch shoes
cheap nfl jerseys
canada goose jackets
ugg boots
coach outlet online
rolex watches outlet
mulberry handbags
true religion jeans
yeezy boost 350
fitflops clearance
tods shoes
ugg outlet
mulberry handbags
coach outlet
toms outlet
mac cosmetics sale
beats by dr dre
louis vuitton bags
moncler jackets
coach outlet
michael kors outlet
longchamp outlet
nba jerseys
fitflops sale clearance
ugg boots
ralph lauren shirts
fitflop sale
michael kors outlet online
cheap ray ban sunglasses
czq20160822

Mon Aug 22, 08:47:00 PM 2016  
Blogger xjd7410@gmail.com said...

20161123 junda
oakley sunglasses
michael kors outlet
adidas nmd runner
ralph lauren uk
michael kors outlet
michael kors factory outlet
ray ban sunglasses
oakley sunglasses
oakley sunglasses
coach outlet

Thu Nov 24, 12:00:00 AM 2016  
Blogger Karen said...

This house flag is Officially Licensed by the NFL and is a high quality item for hanging from your porch or as an interior wall banner.Hang your Minnesota Vikings Double Sided House Flag with our banner pole or fly it with our 5' or 6' flagpoles and adjustable flag brackets.nfl flags wholesale,
house divided flags,Houston Oilers stars and stripes flags
Miami Dolphins banners, House Divided Flags,Sports Flags 3x5, Sports flags and banners,nfl House Divided Flags

Sun Jan 08, 06:53:00 AM 2017  
Blogger Unknown said...

grigio scuro, il terzo camicia Bologna 2016-2017 dispone di un grassetto che raffigura l’iconica Stadio Renato Dall’Ara, che celebra il suo 90 ° anniversario il prossimo anno. La base sobrio del Bologna 2016-17 terza maglia è combinato con i colori blu e rosso, del club tradizionali.maglie calcio poco prezzo,
maglie da calcio a poco prezzo, Vendita Maglia Juventus outlet
Maglia Lazio a poco prezzo 2017

Sun Jan 08, 07:50:00 AM 2017  
Blogger raybanoutlet001 said...

zzzzz2018.4.29
oakley sunglasses wholesale
adidas outlet
jordan 8
ray ban eyeglasses
fitflops sale
carolina jerseys
coach outlet online
hugo boss outlet
true religion outlet
ralph lauren uk

Sun Apr 29, 01:48:00 AM 2018  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home