*************************************
Cuomo to Ban Fracking in New York State, Citing Health Risks
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s
 administration announced on Wednesday that it would ban hydraulic 
fracturing in New York State because of concerns over health risks, 
ending years of uncertainty over the controversial method of natural gas extraction.
State
 officials concluded that fracking, as the method is known, could 
contaminate the air and water and pose inestimable dangers to public 
health.
That
 conclusion was delivered during a year-end cabinet meeting convened by 
Mr. Cuomo in Albany. It came amid increased calls by environmentalists 
to ban fracking, which uses water and chemicals to release natural gas 
trapped in deeply buried shale deposits.
The
 question of whether to allow fracking has been one of the most divisive
 public policy debates in New York in years, pitting environmentalists 
against others who saw it as a critical way to bring jobs to 
economically stagnant portions of upstate.
Mr.
 Cuomo, a Democrat who has prided himself on taking swift and decisive 
action on other contentious issues like gun control, took the opposite 
approach on fracking. He repeatedly put off making a decision on how to 
proceed, most recently citing an ongoing — and seemingly never-ending — 
study by state health officials.
On Wednesday, six weeks after Mr. Cuomo won re-election to a second term, the long-awaited health study finally materialized.
In
 a presentation at the cabinet meeting, the acting state health 
commissioner, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, said the examination had found 
“significant public health risks” associated with fracking.
Holding
 up scientific studies to animate his arguments, Dr. Zucker listed 
concerns about water contamination and air pollution, and said there was
 insufficient scientific evidence to affirm the long-term safety of 
fracking.
Dr. Zucker said his review boiled down to a simple question: Would he want to live in a community that allowed fracking?
He said the answer was no.
“We
 cannot afford to make a mistake,” Dr. Zucker said. “The potential risks
 are too great. In fact, they are not even fully known.”
New
 York has had a de facto ban on the procedure for more than five years, 
predating Mr. Cuomo’s election. Over the course of his first term, Mr. 
Cuomo at times sent conflicting signals about how he would proceed.
In 2012, Mr. Cuomo flirted with approving a limited program
 in several struggling Southern Tier counties along New York’s border 
with Pennsylvania. But later that year, Mr. Cuomo bowed to entreaties 
from environmental advocates, announcing instead that his administration
 would start the regulatory process over by beginning a new study to 
evaluate the health risks.
Polls showed public opinion divided over the issue, and Mr. Cuomo felt pressure from both sides.
Mr.
 Cuomo had focused a great amount of attention on trying to improve the 
economic climate in upstate New York, and fracking appeared to offer a 
way to bring new life to struggling areas atop the Marcellus Shale, a 
gigantic subterranean deposit of trapped gas that extends across much of
 New York State, Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Mr.
 Cuomo’s Republican opponent in this year’s election, Rob Astorino, 
promised to allow fracking, and he accused the governor of squandering 
an opportunity to help upstate.
But
 the governor has also faced strong opposition from groups worried about
 the effects of fracking on the state’s watersheds and aquifers, as well
 as on tourism and the quality of life in small upstate communities.
Opponents
 were aided by celebrities like Yoko Ono who drew attention to their 
cause. As he traveled around the state, Mr. Cuomo was hounded by 
protesters opposed to fracking, who showed up like clockwork at his 
events and pressed him to impose a statewide ban.
The
 governor’s uncertain stance on fracking also hurt his standing with 
some liberal activists. Pledging to ban fracking, a little-known law 
professor won about a third of the vote in the Democratic primary in 
September, a strong showing that Mr. Cuomo later attributed in part to 
support from fracking opponents.
Complicating
 matters, dozens of communities across New York have passed moratoriums 
and bans on fracking, and in June, the state’s highest court, the Court 
of Appeals, ruled that towns could use zoning ordinances to ban fracking.
Recognizing
 the sensitivity of the issue, Mr. Cuomo both affirmed the fracking ban 
on Wednesday and tried to keep some distance from it, saying that he was
 deferring to the expertise of his health and environmental conservation
 commissioners.
Nevertheless,
 environmental groups cast the governor as a hero. Michael Brune, the 
executive director of the Sierra Club, said Mr. Cuomo “set himself apart
 as a national political leader who stands up for people” over the 
energy industry.
But advocates of fracking accused him of giving in to fear-mongering by environmentalists.
“While
 industry will find opportunity elsewhere, our hearts go out to the 
famers and landowners in the Southern Tier whose livelihoods in New York
 State are in jeopardy,” said Brad Gill, executive director of the 
Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York.
Document
Health Department Report on Fracking in New York State
                The Cuomo administration decided to ban hydraulic 
fracturing after concluding that the method posed inestimable 
public-health risks.            
            
         Correction: December 17, 2014  
Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article incompletely described hydraulic fracturing. It is a method of extracting natural gas or oil, not just oil, from deep underground. The error was repeated in the summary.
    
Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article incompletely described hydraulic fracturing. It is a method of extracting natural gas or oil, not just oil, from deep underground. The error was repeated in the summary.
No comments:
Post a Comment