The New York Times nytimes.com
Copyright 2015. The New York Times Company
Why
Giving Back Isn’t Enough.
By DARREN WALKER DEC. 17, 2015
CreditChang W. Lee/The New
York Times
DURING this season of giving, I will join
millions of Americans in volunteering to feed the homeless, contributing to
clothing drives and donating to poverty-fighting charities. Yet I worry that
through these acts of kindness, I absolve myself of asking deeper questions
about injustice and inequality. We Americans are a remarkably bighearted
people, but I believe the purpose of our philanthropy must not only be
generosity, but justice.
The origins of formal philanthropy date from
at least 1889, when the American industrialist Andrew Carnegie composed his
“Gospel of Wealth.” He drafted this intellectual charter at the peak of the
Gilded Age, when inequality had reached extreme levels. Carnegie argued, as
many still do, that inequality on this scale is an unavoidable condition of the
free-market system — and that it was even desirable, if the promise of wealth
incentivized hard work. Philanthropy, he believed, would ease the pressure of rising
social anxiety that followed from inequality — ameliorating the afflictions of
the market without altering the market system itself.
During the 20th century, an entire field of
institutional philanthropy emerged and flourished in the pattern of Carnegie’s
mold. Iconic American families — Gates, Knight, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller
— endowed and expanded foundations that built schools and libraries, developed
new vaccines, revolutionized agriculture and advanced human freedom. My own
organization, the Ford Foundation, has given billions to support everything
from public television in the United States to microlending in Bangladesh.
Our work has been indisputably for the good:
Millions of people around the world have access to new tools and resources with
which to improve their lives. A few months ago, the World Bank estimated that,
for the first time in history, fewer than one in 10 human beings lives in
extreme poverty. This is progress.
And yet, for all the advances made in the last
century, society’s challenges may have outpaced philanthropy’s resources.
Today, the cumulative wealth of the most generous donors seems a pittance
compared with the world’s trillions of dollars’ worth of need. Generosity,
blooming as it may be from legacies of both Carnegie’s age and the newly
enriched, is no longer enough.
The world may need a reimagined charter of
philanthropy — a “Gospel of Wealth” for the 21st century — that serves not just
American philanthropists, but the vast array of new donors emerging around the
world.
This new gospel might begin where the previous
one fell short: addressing the underlying causes that perpetuate human
suffering. In other words, philanthropy can no longer grapple simply with what is
happening in the world, but also with how and why.
Feeding the hungry is among our society’s most
fundamental obligations, but we should also question why our neighbors are
without nutritious food to eat. Housing the homeless is an imperative, but we
should also question why our housing markets are so distorted. As a nation, we
need more investment in education, but not without questioning educational
disparities based on race, class and geography.
Our self-awareness — our humility — shouldn’t
be limited to examining the problems. It should include the structures of
solutions, like giving itself. As the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said not
long before his assassination, “Philanthropy is commendable, but it must not cause
the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice which
make philanthropy necessary.” It is, after all, an offspring of the free
market; it is enabled by returns on capital.
And yet, too often, we have declined to
question our own circumstances: a system that produces vast differences in
privilege, and then tasks the most privileged with improving the system.
Whatever our intentions, the truth is that we
can inadvertently widen inequality in the course of making money, even though we
claim to support equality and justice when giving it away. And while our
end-of-year giving might support worthy organizations, we must also ask if
these financial donations contribute to larger social change.
In other words, “giving back” is necessary,
but not sufficient. We should seek to bring about lasting, systemic change,
even if that change might adversely affect us. We must bend each act of
generosity toward justice.
We, as foundations and individuals, should
fund people, their ideas and organizations that are capable of addressing
deep-rooted injustice. We should ensure that the voices of those most affected
by injustice — women, racial minorities, the poor, religious and ethnic
minorities and L.G.B.T. individuals — help decide where and what philanthropy
puts money behind, not in simply receiving whatever philanthropy decides to
give them.
We can wield data and technology, see through
a diversity of viewpoints, and draw upon a century of philanthropy’s success
and failure to identify and address the barriers holding people back.
This modern giving charter should look
different in different settings. At the Ford Foundation, our efforts will focus
on inequality: not just wealth disparities, but injustices in politics, culture
and society that compound inequality and limit opportunity. We will ask
questions like, are we hearing — and heeding — those who
understand the problems best? What can we do to leverage our privilege to
disrupt the drivers of inequality?
Others in philanthropy will take different,
but no less effective, approaches. Many already are answering King’s call,
working intensely toward a world that renders philanthropy unnecessary.
Ultimately, we each must do our part to ensure that giving not only makes us
feel better, but also makes our society more just.
Darren Walker is the president of the Ford
Foundation.
A
version of this op-ed appears in print on December 18, 2015, on page A39 of the New
York edition with the headline: Why Giving Back Isn’t Enough.
Labels: catholic, catholic social teaching, Christmas gifts, Christmas giving, justice, Philanthropy
CreditChang W. Lee/The New
York Times
